Not Every Moment Requires an Answer

-A system calibration experience worth USD 100-

Last night, I participated in a live-streamed activity known as “blind core fruit opening.”The process was simple: you place an order, select a position, and a craftsman cuts open the fruit on camera. Only after the polishing is complete does the color of the core become visible.

My original intention was also simple —I wanted to test my own frequency-reading system by identifying a “red” core before the outer shell was opened.

The result was this:I selected four fruits, and none of them turned out to be a “pure red” in the strict sense.

• The first fruit was a blind choice and opened as purplish red.

• The second fruit felt red to me but turned out to be pink-orange red.

• The third fruit also felt red and opened as purplish red.

• For the fourth fruit, I initially selected position No. 6. However, it was taken by a previous buyer, and the host replaced it with a new fruit at position No. 6. At that point, I could not read any signal at all — until the very moment the outer shell was cut open, when I immediately received a clear signal: green.

At first, I felt quite frustrated. I began to doubt the accuracy of my frequency-reading system when it came to color differentiation. I had tried very hard to read the colors of more than ten fruits displayed on the table, yet the signals I perceived were extremely faint and blurred — not clear information.

Later, I carefully reflected on why I was able to identify the fourth fruit as green exactly at the moment its shell was cut open.

That was when I suddenly understood something important:the way my decoding system operates is identical to that of a mature barcode decoding system.

In my past work, I spent a long time working with professional-grade barcode scanners. Truly reliable scanners are never designed to “decode everything as fast as possible.”

Their operating principles are strict:

• When the image is unstable, out of focus, or incomplete → no output

• They do not guess data just because a user keeps scanning

• They never output incorrect data merely to appear responsive

Only when all conditions are met:

• Clear image

• Complete structure

• Successful validation

does the decoder output a result — once, and accurately.

That night, my system behaved in exactly the same way with the fourth fruit.

The situation was as follows:

• The original No. 6 fruit was taken by another buyer, and a new fruit was placed

• The new No. 6 fruit was immediately picked up and handed to the craftsman

• I attempted to read it again → no signal at all

• At the instant the shell was cut open → the green signal appeared

During the polishing process:

• Stage one (coarse polishing): color still indistinguishable

• Stage two (fine polishing): green gradually became visible

Why couldn’t I read anything earlier?

This question turned out to be crucial. It revealed why my system functions in the same way as a mature decoding system.

Because within that brief timeline, three things happened simultaneously:

• The old No. 6 object disappeared; the new one had just entered the field

• The new object had not yet completed positional stabilization

• It was immediately moved, transferred, and processed

In system terms, this is equivalent to attempting to parse an object before initialization is complete.

A well-designed firmware system will do one thing in this case:return no value, rather than guessing an answer.

What I experienced at that moment was:

• An attempt to read

• Absolute nothingness

• Not ambiguity, not error — but a clean null

This was not system failure.It was a precision-protection mechanism at work.

Why did the green signal appear exactly at the moment the shell was cut open?

Because that moment was the first time three conditions were met simultaneously:

• The object entered an irreversible state

• The shielding layer was removed, making the core state observable

• The completion event was triggered, allowing safe output

In engineering terms, this is a standard commit / resolve moment.

The green signal I received was not a guess, nor a rushed correction —it was the first moment my frequency-decoding system was allowed to deliver an answer.

From this experience, I clearly saw how my innate system operates:

• When the object is unstable → no response

• When conditions are met → immediate output

• Subsequent visual confirmation → validation, not source

This tells me that my system is not intuition-driven improvisation,but a system that knows when to remain silent.

What I truly learned was not how to pick colors.

If I had focused only on results, this experience would have felt ordinary, even disappointing.But once I recognized that my system operates like a high-grade firmware system, I allowed myself to accept something important:

Failure to receive information is not system failure —it is the system protecting precision.

My system knows when to stay quiet.

It does not force answers just because I want them.It does not fabricate reassurance when conditions are incomplete.It waits until the state is complete — and then responds accurately.

This is the same type of decoder I trusted in the past,and it is the reason I now truly trust myself.

I spent about USD 100 that night opening four fruits.What I bought with that money was trust.

In hindsight, I do not feel that I wasted time or money at all.

Because through a concrete, verifiable experience, I confirmed this:

I trust my system to remain silent when it should,and to respond accurately when the time is right.

This is not a slogan.It is trust written back into the system through lived experience.

For me, this calibration was absolutely worth it.

Conclusion

Some experiences look like “not getting the result you wanted.”In reality, they are moments when you finally understand how your system truly works.

Once I understood this, I no longer needed to be right every time to prove my ability.

I know that silence simply means the timing is not ready.When conditions mature and alignment is complete, the answer will arrive.

Just like a well-written decoder —silence is not emptiness; it exists for accuracy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Postscript

1. The original No. 6 fruit was later opened and turned out to be a deep orange-red, very close to red.

2. For my frequency system, purplish red and orange-red both belong to the same red energetic family.

3. As for why my system struggled to read clear color signals before the fruit was opened, I believe this was not due to a single cause.

In addition to the object being unstabilized and in motion (without a fixed reference coordinate), I later learned that most of these colored fruits undergo artificial dyeing processes.

Based on my past experience, materials that have been artificially altered or enhanced (such as dyed crystals or lab-grown specimens) often exhibit frequencies that are more orderly but significantly weaker. Although the external appearance shows clear color, the internally perceptible energetic signal may be greatly diminished.

Therefore, I interpret the reading difficulty as the combined effect of three factors:an incomplete state, remaining shielding, and frequency flattening caused by artificial intervention.

4. I record and share this experience not to prove how exceptional I am,but to honestly analyze how my innate system functions.

I do not exaggerate, nor do I conceal.

I simply hope that those who resonate with this logic can decide whether I am someone they can trust — and connect with.